<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Criminal Law and Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8418</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>recognition species attempt offence from aspect of circumstance the steps of that act</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>recognition species attempt offence from aspect of circumstance the steps of that act</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>165</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>184</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60826</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zeraat</LastName>
<Affiliation>phd and faculty member university of kashan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahmaninaimabadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>phd student of criminal law and criminology university of kashan</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>attempt victims in two main criminal offense and its sentence , it is punishment that in first case attempt victims in three states began to implement a crime , start to crime operations and being hidden start implementing or start to implement crime and start crime operations appear and other conditions , is the existence of obstacle out of the will that with by indicating levitating of intention , attempt will appear. The second mode of behavior is known as the sentence of crime start that in addition to start to implementation of the crime and completion of the execution path only in mode of inadequacy of the means because of carelessness of committed is in the sentence crime starting that should be the other two conditions that’s mean inability of nature device that shows action permissible And inadequate and low-effect of means that start to executive operations of crime and as a result show real attempt, be specified. &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">attempt victims in two main criminal offense and its sentence , it is punishment that in first case attempt victims in three states began to implement a crime , start to crime operations and being hidden start implementing or start to implement crime and start crime operations appear and other conditions , is the existence of obstacle out of the will that with by indicating levitating of intention , attempt will appear. The second mode of behavior is known as the sentence of crime start that in addition to start to implementation of the crime and completion of the execution path only in mode of inadequacy of the means because of carelessness of committed is in the sentence crime starting that should be the other two conditions that’s mean inability of nature device that shows action permissible And inadequate and low-effect of means that start to executive operations of crime and as a result show real attempt, be specified. &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Start to do executive</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Start to acts of executive offence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Purpose be abeyance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Insufficiently of fitment</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jclp.ut.ac.ir/article_60826_9c3fe29981a4e13b222cbdc8c9fa5399.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Criminal Law and Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8418</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A review of the Persian translation of the Leviathan 
from the Criminal Law concepts point of view</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A review of the Persian translation of the Leviathan 
from the Criminal Law concepts point of view</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>185</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>205</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60830</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Naser</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soltani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, department of private Law,Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Legal expressions and concepts are abundant in many of fundamental texts of the modern political thought. The language of law has been one of the main means within which discussion about political thought has taken place. Therefore when these texts are translated or transmitted into other languages, the meaning and the content of the legal expressions and concepts in terms of their scope and connotations should be considered. Only in this situation one can rely on these translations and they deserve to be cited. So the revision and reconsideration of these texts from the legal concepts point of view might be very useful and necessary. In this paper for demonstrating my argument I focusing on the legal expressions and concepts of the Persian translation of the Leviathan and their precision and accuracy will be evaluated. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Legal expressions and concepts are abundant in many of fundamental texts of the modern political thought. The language of law has been one of the main means within which discussion about political thought has taken place. Therefore when these texts are translated or transmitted into other languages, the meaning and the content of the legal expressions and concepts in terms of their scope and connotations should be considered. Only in this situation one can rely on these translations and they deserve to be cited. So the revision and reconsideration of these texts from the legal concepts point of view might be very useful and necessary. In this paper for demonstrating my argument I focusing on the legal expressions and concepts of the Persian translation of the Leviathan and their precision and accuracy will be evaluated. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">crime</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">sin</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Arbitrary Punishment</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Excuses</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jclp.ut.ac.ir/article_60830_f1d6ee76b4debb19734f160b8017c1d8.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Criminal Law and Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8418</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The training styles and the Prevention of Delinquency from crime</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The training styles and the Prevention of Delinquency from crime</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>207</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>224</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60840</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Adel</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sarikhani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor University of Qom</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Family as the first and most important social institution, can has negative or positive significant influence on diversity growing of children, development of their characters and behavior by using the common or religious style training. Accordingly, the parenting styles can be divided into two general categories: one secular styles that are based on human vision and other religious style that is based on religious teachings. But what is especially important, is the outcomes of each of these styles in better prevention of delinquency arising from the education of children. &lt;br /&gt;Hence the result of this comparison, shows that the religious responsibility parenting style based on the Quranic verses anecdotes, is the best parenting method that can be effective in the prevention of children’s delinquency, who be trained with it. Meanwhile the authoritative parenting &lt;br /&gt;style from the secular styles has more closeness to the religious responsibility parenting style, but the other secular parenting styles (permissive, authoritarian and negligent) are numbered as unhealthy styles. Because they not only prevent of the children’s anomaly and delinquency, but also are hurtful and producer law-breaking.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Family as the first and most important social institution, can has negative or positive significant influence on diversity growing of children, development of their characters and behavior by using the common or religious style training. Accordingly, the parenting styles can be divided into two general categories: one secular styles that are based on human vision and other religious style that is based on religious teachings. But what is especially important, is the outcomes of each of these styles in better prevention of delinquency arising from the education of children. &lt;br /&gt;Hence the result of this comparison, shows that the religious responsibility parenting style based on the Quranic verses anecdotes, is the best parenting method that can be effective in the prevention of children’s delinquency, who be trained with it. Meanwhile the authoritative parenting &lt;br /&gt;style from the secular styles has more closeness to the religious responsibility parenting style, but the other secular parenting styles (permissive, authoritarian and negligent) are numbered as unhealthy styles. Because they not only prevent of the children’s anomaly and delinquency, but also are hurtful and producer law-breaking.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Training</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">style</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Humane</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">religious</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Prevention</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">crime</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jclp.ut.ac.ir/article_60840_38761d4feb1260c47637f23e2356c691.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Criminal Law and Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8418</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Study about Hodood ( Article 220 of the Penal Code) with approach  contemporary jurisprudence</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Study about Hodood ( Article 220 of the Penal Code) with approach  contemporary jurisprudence</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>225</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>253</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60841</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohamad Rasool</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahangaran</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehrdad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saeedi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Orsaji</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Article 220 of the Penal Code, adopted in 1392 by the judges to have recourse to the legal sources. In this study, therefore, to the question of whether Hudud other than statutory law exists, to be answered. So try all offenses committed in the books of hadith and jurisprudence in Imami talk about there, whether independent or other subsidiary rules as initially proposed, and the mind to know the extent of their Mtbadrmy be browsed. And thereby also to inform public opinion of jurists and the Byshtrmtlvb scientific interest.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Article 220 of the Penal Code, adopted in 1392 by the judges to have recourse to the legal sources. In this study, therefore, to the question of whether Hudud other than statutory law exists, to be answered. So try all offenses committed in the books of hadith and jurisprudence in Imami talk about there, whether independent or other subsidiary rules as initially proposed, and the mind to know the extent of their Mtbadrmy be browsed. And thereby also to inform public opinion of jurists and the Byshtrmtlvb scientific interest.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">hodood</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">hodood thetic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">hodood unthetic</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jclp.ut.ac.ir/article_60841_abea59ffda1c7e58d2ec3aaac66ec9e0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Criminal Law and Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8418</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Victim and penal populism</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Victim and penal populism</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>255</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>275</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60842</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sheidaeean</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant of professor –PhD of criminal law</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Javad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rajabi Salman</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D candidate of criminal law</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>06</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The victim founds penal populism in the different forms. The crime fear and its public concern somehow intensify the criminal populist crackdown. Often the crimes with special victims (in terms of age and sex), attract attention of media and public opinion further. Thus, these crimes further stimulate public sentiment and consequently affect on penal policy. The victims participate direct and indirect in the criminal process by the expression of their demands from the criminal justice. Also, by means of this method, victim causes the direction of penal policy towards the populism. The victims by report the crime in unreal victimization and its exaggeration, provides focus of media on criminal subjects. In these circumstances, the possibility to move criminal policy towards populism is provided. Also the idea of victim extreme protection could move criminal policy to the point of ignorance of the accused rights. Thus in this article we discuss about the orientation of criminal policy towards populism in the effect of the victim. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The victim founds penal populism in the different forms. The crime fear and its public concern somehow intensify the criminal populist crackdown. Often the crimes with special victims (in terms of age and sex), attract attention of media and public opinion further. Thus, these crimes further stimulate public sentiment and consequently affect on penal policy. The victims participate direct and indirect in the criminal process by the expression of their demands from the criminal justice. Also, by means of this method, victim causes the direction of penal policy towards the populism. The victims by report the crime in unreal victimization and its exaggeration, provides focus of media on criminal subjects. In these circumstances, the possibility to move criminal policy towards populism is provided. Also the idea of victim extreme protection could move criminal policy to the point of ignorance of the accused rights. Thus in this article we discuss about the orientation of criminal policy towards populism in the effect of the victim. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Victim</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">populism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Penal Policy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Populist penal policy</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jclp.ut.ac.ir/article_60842_0d52d3e4fc3e472ed6bfe35cb6785b40.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Criminal Law and Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8418</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Pathology of Official’s Civil Liability in the Islamic Penal Code</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Pathology of Official’s Civil Liability in the Islamic Penal Code</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>277</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>298</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60843</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Badini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Department of Private and Islamic Law of Tehran Universit</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahi Damanjani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student Private Law of Tarbiat Modares University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alipour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student Private Law of Kharazmi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Including the question of the basis of legal systems, official’s civil liability from executing the illegal order of the competent authorities; that has always preoccupied the minds of legal scholars. In the &lt;em&gt;Civil Law&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Civil Liability Law&lt;/em&gt; in 1960 is silent with respect to the above issue. But the second section of the Article 159 Islamic Penal Code in 2013 provides Official’s civil liability from the illegal orders of the competent authorities _ to cause mistake to think that the law is acceptable _ is executed, about wergild and civil liability subject to generalrules responsibility. Of course, by considering the recent law is well known that Articles 473, 495 and 496 links with the second section of Article 159 of the mentioned Law and by analyzing them should be deduced to general rule relating to official’s civil liability from executing the illegal order of the Competent Authorities. However, it seems various objections to mentioned Articles can be entitled objections structure codification, including not raised the subject in a subset of civil law, and substantive and technical objections, such as failure of the prediction different statements executing the illegal order of the competent authorities and Their impact on the Official’s civil liability and failure of the justification of the acceptable mistake criterion of the official to execute such orders by legislator that should be studied and in the end, will propos to legislativein this field. &lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Including the question of the basis of legal systems, official’s civil liability from executing the illegal order of the competent authorities; that has always preoccupied the minds of legal scholars. In the &lt;em&gt;Civil Law&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Civil Liability Law&lt;/em&gt; in 1960 is silent with respect to the above issue. But the second section of the Article 159 Islamic Penal Code in 2013 provides Official’s civil liability from the illegal orders of the competent authorities _ to cause mistake to think that the law is acceptable _ is executed, about wergild and civil liability subject to generalrules responsibility. Of course, by considering the recent law is well known that Articles 473, 495 and 496 links with the second section of Article 159 of the mentioned Law and by analyzing them should be deduced to general rule relating to official’s civil liability from executing the illegal order of the Competent Authorities. However, it seems various objections to mentioned Articles can be entitled objections structure codification, including not raised the subject in a subset of civil law, and substantive and technical objections, such as failure of the prediction different statements executing the illegal order of the competent authorities and Their impact on the Official’s civil liability and failure of the justification of the acceptable mistake criterion of the official to execute such orders by legislator that should be studied and in the end, will propos to legislativein this field. &lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Penal Code</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">civil liability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Illegal Order</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Competent Authorities</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Official</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Structural Objections</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Substantial Objections</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Acceptable Mistake Criterion</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jclp.ut.ac.ir/article_60843_41b5523e812fe67019a0a579d761cbc1.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Criminal Law and Policy</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8418</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Analysis the Mental Element of Deliberate Homicide Caused by Conscious Recklessness</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Analysis the Mental Element of Deliberate Homicide Caused by Conscious Recklessness</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>299</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>317</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60844</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Jalal-al-din</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghiasi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology at the University of Qom</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Davari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Criminal Law and Criminology PHD student at the University of Qom</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the innovations of the legislator in Article 292 of the Penal Code Act of 1392 created the deliberate homicide of conscious recklessness to which According, homicide In effect Initial treatment voluntarily commit with his awareness and attention that his action is typically killing the other, will commit, without commit has the intention of killing someone. In this type of deliberate homicide, there is no intention in action located on victim and not awareness and attention is Supposed, unlike the second criterion deliberate homicide. However, in both deliberate homicide, commits’ awareness and attention, by personal criteria and action typically involves killing the other, with public criteria is measured, Along with this difference that deliberate homicide of conscious recklessness, common criteria for the diagnosis of a typical act of killing another being is common human, unlike the second criterion deliberate homicide that common criteria because of Profession ality is In the field of medical science. As far as it goes, Expected legislator considers the ta&#039;zir punishment to deliberate homicide of conscious recklessness because of Lack of explicit intention homicide along with limiting retaliation to the actual murder. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">One of the innovations of the legislator in Article 292 of the Penal Code Act of 1392 created the deliberate homicide of conscious recklessness to which According, homicide In effect Initial treatment voluntarily commit with his awareness and attention that his action is typically killing the other, will commit, without commit has the intention of killing someone. In this type of deliberate homicide, there is no intention in action located on victim and not awareness and attention is Supposed, unlike the second criterion deliberate homicide. However, in both deliberate homicide, commits’ awareness and attention, by personal criteria and action typically involves killing the other, with public criteria is measured, Along with this difference that deliberate homicide of conscious recklessness, common criteria for the diagnosis of a typical act of killing another being is common human, unlike the second criterion deliberate homicide that common criteria because of Profession ality is In the field of medical science. As far as it goes, Expected legislator considers the ta&#039;zir punishment to deliberate homicide of conscious recklessness because of Lack of explicit intention homicide along with limiting retaliation to the actual murder. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">mental element</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">deliberate homicide</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conscious recklessness</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jclp.ut.ac.ir/article_60844_6785f52233427d476570b90d6d9845ff.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
